Writers of Pro Football Prospectus 2008

11 Dec 2009

Week 14 Open Discussion Thread

...crap. Sorry everyone, been under the weather. Here's the Week 14 thread.

Posted by: Bill Barnwell on 11 Dec 2009

316 replies , Last at 15 Dec 2009, 5:02am by jimbohead

1
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Fri, 12/11/2009 - 1:56am

Steelers never showed up against the Browns. Roethlisberger's problem with sacks continues. Five in the first half! Some of the sacks were coverage sacks, while others were quick sacks.

I think we can declare the Steelers' playoff hopes officially dead. What a collapse!

2
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by perly :: Fri, 12/11/2009 - 2:31am

Is it too soon to say that hell has been unleashed?

3
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by ammek :: Fri, 12/11/2009 - 5:31am

Hell hath no fury like Brian Schaefering.

94
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Balaji (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:20pm

As a Steeler fan, it feels like hell to me.

I mean, I could have dealt with missing the playoffs, but doing so because they lost to Oakland and Cleveland in consecutive games? Ouch.

4
Tomlin
by andrew :: Fri, 12/11/2009 - 9:46am

so Mike Tomlin won a superbowl then misses the playoffs next year, just like Cowher. He just eliminated all the years of playoff futility that preceded the superbowl win.

I'm sure our buddy who keeps calling him Omar (I still don't get what that's about) would be of the opinion that they'd have won that superbowl anyway with Wisenhunt. Then again he probably would think Rich Kotite could have coached that team to a superbowl win too. (substitute Kotite with whomever you identify as the worst nfl coach in history).

Its weird though, I do think Tomlin was a very good defensive coach, he did a great job in Minnesota, and he seems to have the right temperament to be a head coach... but his statements about fixing it and being accountable and unleashing hell and so on are kind of hollow when losing to the Chiefs, Raiders and Browns.

Despite his troubles, you can't just fire a coach who just won a superbowl, can you? Then again Barry Switzer won a superbowl too, though, and his legacy with the Cowboys is probably regarded as a failure. In a way I think the closest parallel might be Brian Billick. He also came from the Vikings as a respected coordinator, he also won a superbowl immediately. And he used the cred garnered with that to buy him a lot more years than he probably would have been accorded otherwise.

    Coaches who "inherited" teams that won a championship and then declined afterwards include:

  • Barry Switzer is pretty much the gold standard. 12-4 lost nfc championship, 12-4 superbowl champs, 6-10, fired.
  • Brian Billick 8-8, 12-4 superbowl champs, 10-6, 7-9, 10-6, 9-7, 6-10, 13-3, 5-11, fired.
  • Larry Coker - Gold standard for college. Utterly dominant national champions, lost championship game (in 2 OT), #5, #11, unranked, fired.
  • Don McCafferty - 11-2-1 superbowl champs, 10-4 lost afc championship, 1-5, fired for refusing to bench Unitas.

    FWIW I think Tomlin would be a great TV personality if this steelers gig doesn't work out.

5
Re: Tomlin
by patriotsgirl :: Fri, 12/11/2009 - 11:00am

Tomlin looks like Omar Epps, the actor. At least I think that's the reason.

Pittsburgh's decline this season (and losses to a series of teams that no contender should lose to once, let alone three times) is shocking.

7
Re: Tomlin
by FireOmarTomlin :: Fri, 12/11/2009 - 12:17pm

Yup, missing the playoffs with a SB defending champ that returns 20 starters is terrible, but doing it with a vastly easier schedule that includes losing 3 games to (recently) perennial bottom6 teams is unacceptable. But I'm just an unrealistic hater.... so I'm told. Really, he's a great coach who obviously gets his team up for every game--- The Browns, Raiders, and Chiefs (Bears... Bengals ??!?!?) just obviously have superior talent, top to bottom. The sad thing is they'll actually probably come out and play really well, finishing 8-8 instead of 6-10, costing themselves 6-8 slots in the draft.

9
Re: Tomlin
by ammek :: Fri, 12/11/2009 - 1:38pm

I'd separate those two things.

The Steelers' decline is not that shocking: see the Almanac.

Losing to all three of the worst teams in the AFC is.

13
Re: Tomlin
by patriotsgirl :: Sat, 12/12/2009 - 2:42am

Sorry, meant to say that the decline, as evidenced by the loss to the three teams, is shocking. If they'd beaten even two of the three teams, we probably wouldn't be having this conversation.

(Hell, if they had the same record as they have now, and lost to the Chargers, Vikings, and Broncos rather than those three teams, we wouldn't be having this conversation. Which ties in with your point.)

Still, it's kind of amazing that their struggles have been kind of below the radar (at least up here in the Great White North), particularly in comparison to a certain Boston-area team...

8
Re: Tomlin
by FireOmarTomlin :: Fri, 12/11/2009 - 12:37pm

<<<
Omar (I still don't get what that's about)
>>>

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/gallery/featured/GAL1149907/1/ind...

10
Re: Tomlin
by wr (not verified) :: Fri, 12/11/2009 - 2:37pm

Wow. That's a spooky close resemblance.

With the caveat that I don't follow the Steelers real closely:
Given that the 2006 team did a poor job of defending the title with Cowher, it
doesn't seem like it is time (yet) to get too far down on Tomlin. But the way
they responded to him the last two weeks is cause for concern - unless Polomalu
was that critical a piece of the performance puzzle.

11
Re: Tomlin
by FireOmarTomlin :: Fri, 12/11/2009 - 3:03pm

<<<<
Wow. That's a spooky close resemblance.

With the caveat that I don't follow the Steelers real closely:
Given that the 2006 team did a poor job of defending the title with Cowher, it
doesn't seem like it is time (yet) to get too far down on Tomlin. But the way
they responded to him the last two weeks is cause for concern - unless Polomalu
was that critical a piece of the performance puzzle.

>>>>

2006 team still mostly beat the teams they *should have* while battling serious injury problems (if you want to play the injury card.... remember big ben faceplanted into a car windshield, had appendicitis, etc that year) They started 2-6 and finished 6-2, the opposite (basically) of this season.

Losses were to teams that (finished)
8-8
8-8
14-2
7-9
9-7
2-14 (Despite the Steelers out-gaining the Raiders 360-98 in total offense, Roethlisberger threw four interceptions (two of which were returned for touchdowns) :(
13-3 (x2)

2 teams that were below 500-- 1 doormat

Compare that to this season
losses so far to teams that through 12(13) games are
2-11
3-9
4-8
5-7
6-6
9-3 (x2)

5 teams that will likely finish under 500, with losses to 3 doormats.

16
Re: Tomlin
by MC2 :: Sat, 12/12/2009 - 11:45pm

I can't believe that SI lookalike gallery didn't include Kevin Durant and Jamie Foxx.

19
Re: Tomlin
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:00pm

How much do you suppose Jeff Kent paid to have Brad Pitt as his look-alike?

161
Re: Tomlin
by Still Alive (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:29pm

I had exactly the same thought. Also Durant really does look like Jaime Fox sometimes.

15
Re: Tomlin
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sat, 12/12/2009 - 9:22pm

Jon Gruden.

6
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by mattman :: Fri, 12/11/2009 - 11:28am

Did anyone notice this sequence from last night's Steelers/Browns game?

Steelers facing 3rd and 8 at around the Cleveland 40. Incomplete pass with an offensive holding flag. Cleveland declines the penalty to bring up 4th and 8. Steelers leave their offense on the field to go for it, and Eric Mangini confers with the officials and accepts the penalty, making it 3rd and 18 from the 50.

Okay, so you can just change your mind on accepting a penalty based on what the other team does? The official had already announced penalty declined and 4th and 8. Do the rules really let you go back on that? Weird. Anyone else notice this?

162
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Still Alive (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:30pm

Good question.

12
Brady questionable vs. Panthers
by PatsFan :: Fri, 12/11/2009 - 6:05pm

The Friday injury list:
DOUBTFUL
DL Myron Pryor, chest

QUESTIONABLE
QB Tom Brady, rib/right finger/shoulder
WR Sam Aiken, shoulder
LB Tully Banata-Cain, shoulder
WR Julian Edelman, forearm
DE Jarvis Green, knee
T Nick Kaczur, ankle
G Stephen Neal, ankle
RB Fred Taylor, ankle
DE Ty Warren, ankle

PROBABLE
LB Rob Ninkovich, knee
CB Shawn Springs, knee
T Sebastian Vollmer, head
TE Benjamin Watson, knee

14
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Raiderjoe :: Sat, 12/12/2009 - 7:49pm

predicitions

Saints 27, falcs 23
Ravebns 34, Liosn 10
Packers 27, bears 25
Texans 31, seahwks 13
Colts 27, broncos 17
dolphins 17, Jaguars 14
Bills 19, chiefs 14
Vikigns 20, bengals 12
Jets 28, Bucans 3
Patriots 38, panters 10
titans 30, ramms 0
Raiders 24, redksins 9
chrgers 17, cowbys 10
Eagles 34, giants 27
Cardinals 28, 49s 27

17
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 1:42pm

I'm surprised you have the Saints/Falcons and Packers/Bears games that close. Should be interesting to see how it comes out.

183
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:53pm

And Raiderjoe was right about both. I'm impressed.

191
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Raiderjoe :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 5:00pm

thanks. Made some prtety good picks today. Missed NO-atl score by 1 point. also JetsBucs 26-3 right now at 2 minuet warning and picked it to be 28-3

198
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Sifter :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 5:13pm

Awesome picks by RJ thus far.

244
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by batbatt :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 8:23pm

So maybe down the road we can do a write-in campaign to have Sierra Nevada sponsor RJ "lock of the week" or something like that before each week of games. I know you all would watch that...

245
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Raiderjoe :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 8:30pm

went 12-1 so far. only got Raiders game wrong. if gradkowski not get injrued maybe Raiders could have come bac. J Russell too rusty .not get enough reps in practice

playoff no shot now. Just play out season . only goal now is to spoil broncos and RAvens seaosns .

246
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by John (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 8:51pm

Dude. You are so my hero.

Disregarding the Raiders game and the late game for obvious reasons, you were within 3 points of the winning score on 7 games, within 3 points of the losing score on 5 games (including 3 exact matches), and you picked every game correctly.

Taking the sum of all the winning scores vs. your predictions, you were off by only 15 points, 1.25/game.

I mean, seriously, what crystal ball fell into your lap? Have you been conversing with Sauron in the missing Palantir?

294
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by John (not verified) :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 12:44am

And the scores may be off, but the Eagles by 7 over the Giants sure looks like a good call with 1.5 minutes left in the game.

305
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by 2468ben :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 3:05am

This right here seals your FO Hall of Fame bid.

307
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Spielman :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 9:56am

I am agog.

18
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 1:59pm

Here is what the television gods have decreed for me today:
Early: NO-ATL and DEN-IND
Late: SD-DAL

I'll be starting with the NO-ATL matchup.

20
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:03pm

Mine refuses to tell me what the other games are. [Vikings QB's] greatness cannot be eclipsed by the profanity of admitting to other teams' existence.

Gumbel and Dierdorf announcing and Gumbel immediately discussing how nice it is to be indoors. It is absolutely NOT cold outside.

21
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:06pm

ATL runs a little dump off to Snelling over the middle. No one on NO picks him up, so Snelling rumbles for a sweet 38-yard gain.

23
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:09pm

ATL stall in the red zone and settle for the FG. ATL with the early 3-0 lead.

22
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:07pm

Dierdorf tells us that ending up on a third-and-12 on your first possession is "not the ideal start to a game."

It's actually third-and-14--no word on whether that's the ideal start.

25
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:10pm

Dierdorf:cliches::flies:shit

29
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:12pm

Are you suggesting you knew that was not the ideal start to a game without Dierdorf to tell you?!

Blasphemy!

24
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by tmohr (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:09pm

Ryan Grant goes 62 yards on Green Bay's first play. It's gonna be a long day in Chicago.

26
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:11pm

Keep your hopes up. There's still a long ways to go and Grant's fumble persona could take over.

32
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:13pm

He will have a great day. I benched him in both fantasy leagues.

28
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by TomC :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:12pm

Josh Bullocks ran full speed laterally in the opposite direction of the run on that play. I literally have no idea what he was doing (nor did Brian Billick).

My other favorite new Bear, Frank Omiyale, has a missed block on a 3rd and 2 and a false start already. Thanks, Jerry Angelo, thanks very much.

33
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by TomC :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:13pm

And now a holding penalty negating a conversion on 3rd and 12. Why is Omiyale out there and not Beekman? Why?

36
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:17pm

Perhaps Omiyale is the one with the requisite skills to reanimate Pace's corpse in between place. It's just too bad no one there has the skills to reanimate it during plays.

44
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:29pm

*in between PLAYS.

Hi, English is my first language.

27
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:11pm

The Bengals took a holding penalty on the opening return, then on the seven-play drive ended up with 2 false starts and a declined OPI.

And they punt and the Vikings take a holding penalty on the return.
This game is off to an ugly start.

31
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:13pm

Pats go for it on 4th and short and fail using the same play that failed last week on 4th and short.

At least this week they were not in FG position. But I did not for a second think Sammy Morris would pick up the first down.

34
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:16pm

The Vikings' first drive is a three-and-out. [Vikings QB] attempted to throw an interception to a perfectly-covered Sidney Rice, but Rice was able to knock it away from Leon Hall.

35
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Harris :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:16pm

Say, has anyone heard that Palmer is doing all hand-offs with his right hand? Why, I've never heard madness of this EVERY SINGLE WEEK.

Hail Hydra!

37
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:18pm

NO has a methodical little drive down the field, but stalls in the red zone, too. They settle for the FG to tie the game at 3-3.

38
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:23pm

Well, we're not even halfway through the first quarter, but I would say the Viking defense looks a ton better with Winfield back.

And Jasper Brinkley looks pretty good so far as E.J. Henderson's replacement. Of course, he hasn't had to do much so far.

39
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:25pm

ATL runs a little quick hitter right up the middle that gains 12 yards. There was end around motion behind the hand-off that seemed to freeze the LBs. The next play, ATL run a reverse to Weems that gains 31 yards. That was a sweet play combination.

40
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by montanapanthersfan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:28pm

So, new qb coach, and both Delhomme and Moore struggle with overthrows. Hmm.

41
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:28pm

Jonathan Joseph gets a VERY late illegal contact penalty on Sidney Rice.

Rice sat on the ground whining about needing a flat for about half an hour before they called it.

And on the next play, Joseph and Shiancoe get called for unnecessary roughness.

42
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:28pm

We just had our first in-game reminder that Chris Redman had been out of the game for 3 years selling insurance.

43
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by perly :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:29pm

"And when they come to the dinner table, the Colts, they eat."

The Broncos, on 3rd & 2, unveil what appears to be a Martzian flea-flicker end-around. Sadly, the Colts get penetration and tackle Buckhalter for no gain before the play can turn into a genuine disaster.

45
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:30pm

ATL have their drive stall in the red zone when the zebras miss NO committing a face mask penalty against Redman, who had attempted to get the first down scrambling after his pass protection broke down. ATL get their second FG to go back up 6-3.

46
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:31pm

Anybody know what the single game penalties record is? The Bengals appear to be doing their best to break it.

122
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Raiderjoe :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:50pm

record for one gam is 22 penalites

brooklyn tigers, 9/17/44
bears, 11/26/44
49rs, 10/4/98

125
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:53pm

Thank you, Raiderjoe. 54 years between the second and third time ever--that's amazing.

140
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by young curmudgeon (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:05pm

Of course they had 22 penalties--they only had one leg!

47
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by perly :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:34pm

Mike Nolan's Broncos defense not looking meaningfully different from Larry Coyer's. Colts up early, 14-0.

51
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:37pm

After the dark days of Jim Bates (2007) and Bob Slowik (2008), Larry Coyer isn't so bad.

48
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:35pm

At the end of the first quarter, it seems NO have no answers on defense for ATL, who have been moving at will against NO. The two ATL stops were poor execution by ATL and an uncalled face mask penalty.

49
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by montanapanthersfan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:36pm

...welcome to the end zone, Mr Smith.

52
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:37pm

Special thanks for Mr. Moss, who meandered through his route, which led to the pick.

50
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:36pm

NO's Stinchcomb slow to get up.

76
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:57pm

I never heard what the injury was. Nonetheless, Stinchcomb has returned to the game.

53
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:38pm

I'm getting tired of this... Manning just kills the Broncos every single time!

58
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:42pm

It was bad enough when Jimmy Smith had our number. Now we have the guy who's normally the best player in the league doing it.

54
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:38pm

I popped over to the DEN-IND game during the injury time out just in time to see IND stuff DEN on a DEN 4th and 1 run attempt from the IND 41. On the next play, Manning tries to hit Garcon for the TD, but the DEN DB had excellent coverage and broke up the pass.

55
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:40pm

There is a Bengals player down, but Gumbel and Dierdorf do not feel the need to tell us who it is. I couldn't read his number, so I just know it's someone on defense.

56
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:41pm

Chris Crocker--they have now told us. And he walked off the field on his own power.

66
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:51pm

Now, 10 real-time minutes later, he's being carted off.

95
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:20pm

With 2:50 to go, they announce that he will not return. Good luck to him.

57
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by perly :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:42pm

facing 3rd&4, the Broncos hurry to the line. The OL stays set, and Orton calls the receivers back to a 6-man huddle. The Colts stay in their base defense, wait for the Broncos to set and the ball to be snapped. Result? Slant to Royal, 3 yard gain.

Moreno is stuffed on 4th& 1, and the Colts have the ball again on their own 40.

59
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:43pm

Jacob Lacey makes a fantastic tackle on third down. Broncos goes for it and Moreno id stopped in the backfield by Bracket. IND ball at their 41.

Goodman stays with Garcon stride for stride 60 yards down field, and bats it away. Impressive.

If the colts score here, its over.

Manning against the Broncos the last 5 games: 80% completions, 15/1 TD to int. rate and 345 yards per game. Colts 3 and out. Yay...

60
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:43pm

[Vikings QB] just completed a TD pass a full two yards beyond the line of scrimmage. Credit to the officials, they threw the flag.

308
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Spielman :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 10:01am

And then marked off the penalty as if he'd thrown the pass *four* yards beyond the line of scrimmage, making the actual penalty yardage one yard. (Plus, y'know, the loss of the TD on the play and the loss of down.)

The spotting in that game was pretty consistently lousy, actually, with that one being the most egregious example.

61
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:43pm

Brees to Meachem for a 43 yard gain to the ATL 11-yard line. Meachem had gone in motion to the left, the ATL DB sat on the route, and Meachem did a little swim move to get by the DB. The pass from Brees was almost too long, but Meachem was able to reel it in.

63
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:46pm

NO get the TD on a little wheel route to Reggie Bush, who made a great athletic play to put the ball in his left hand and sneak the ball just inside the pylon as his momentum was taking the rest of him out of bounds. NO 10-6.

62
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:46pm

Marshall catches it 5 yards down field on 2nd and 12, runs across the field for 15 yac. 4 colts had a shot on him, and they hardly slowed him down...

64
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:48pm

Wow. Moss is really killing the Pats today.

70
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Big-Hairy-Andy :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:54pm

Maybe it's all part of a Belichick masterplan. If New England aren't in the lead at halftime, the other team can't come back...

78
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:00pm

That didn't work against New Orleans.

109
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Big-Hairy-Andy :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:36pm

New England could have started fifteen defensive players and played a 4-5-6 defense all day, and that wouldn't have worked against New Orleans. There's stinking defense, and there's New England's secondary against the Saints.

65
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:48pm

It seems the Jaguars, as axpected, are frauds... How will the playoff picture look if they loose to the Dolphins?

67
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:51pm

McDaniels calls a HB draw on third and 6 (!). Against the fastest defense in the league to boot.

69
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:53pm

Check him very carefully for a protruding belly and a walrus-like mustache.

72
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:54pm

lol.

Seriously, though, not even Reid would do that...

82
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by montanapanthersfan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:05pm

I took it as a Holmgren reference.

85
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:07pm

I indeed meant Holmgren, but Andy Reid works perfectly well, too.

68
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:52pm

For all of you fantasy owners who started Chris Redman today: With just over 9 minutes to go in the 1st half, he's 5/6 for 66 yards. As I wrote this, Redman overthrew Jenkins by about 6 inches which would have been a 69-yard TD pass.

71
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:54pm

NO get their first stop of the day. Bush fields the punt and somehow gets a 24 yard return out of it. It looked like he was going to be stopped inside the NO 15-yard line a couple of times.

73
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:54pm

Palmer just gift-wrapped a pick to Winfield and he, unsurprisingly, couldn't hold onto it.

Dierdorf of course does not realize that ,as good as Winfield is, he cannot catch anything, and suggests that he must have been "surprised."

74
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:56pm

The Broncos get called for a BS piling on penalty. Garcon fumbled the ball, recovered quickly - the bronco defender was chasing a live ball..

75
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:56pm

Maualuga hits Reynaud out of bounds for a 15-yard penalty. The Bengals now have 8 penalties for 65 yards.

79
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:00pm

At the risk of jinxing myself, I have to say the NO-ATL game has been relatively flag free. Twice, the officials have picked up OPI flags after realizing that the TE was just continuing his block 10 yards down field, said block having started at the line of scrimmage.

77
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 2:59pm

Dallas Clarke drops the pass on third down, and makes a beautiful catch on fourth down. Indy in the redzone. This game might be over... Yikes...

80
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:04pm

ATL bring a blitz. Brees rolls away from the pressure and makes a great pass to Shockey who makes a great catch for a 12-yard gain.

On the next play, ATL get called for a DPI. It looked like the ATL DB had a decent arm bar on the NO receiver.

81
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:04pm

Manning to a wide open Clarke in the back of the endzone off playaction. Ballgame. I'm switching games - this is horrible...

83
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:06pm

Peterson seemingly by himself moves the Vikings down the field (he had 42 of the 66 yards on the drive) and [Vikings QB] gets to complete a TD to Sidney Rice at the end.

84
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:06pm

NO seem to have found their rhythm on offense. At the two minute warning, they're just into the red zone with a first and 10. NO have had the ball for 10+ minutes in the second quarter, I think. ATL have only 13 yards of offense in the second quarter.

86
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:09pm

Palmer is throwing into coverage an awful lot.

Dierdorf is complaining about Ochocinco's sombrero antics last week. I still don't understand how you can even fine someone for putting on a frickin' hat. (I'm sure it's because it's not official team apparel but for crying out loud that's dumb.)

87
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:11pm

NO cap off their drive with a 3-yard Brees-Colston TD pass. And then: DOINK! Just before half time it's NO 16-6.

88
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:12pm

Kevin Williams gets called for hitting Palmer out of bounds. He looks like he's laughing as he gets called. There have now been 12 penalties for 90 yards in the game.

By the way, my earlier statement about the Bengals was off. I didn't think nfl.com was yet including the most recent penalty. They have 7-for-50.

99
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:27pm

Now they have 8-for-65. They have actually played very, very well to be down by 3.

89
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:14pm

Palmer completes a short pass to Ochocinco who takes it in for a TD.

Ray Edwards is down on the play. Trainers are on the field.

90
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:15pm

Edwards walked to the sideline on his own power.

91
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:19pm

They just showed a replay and that was actually a neat play. Ochocinco faked an end-around (Dierdorf says "reverse") then went back outside and Winfield just couldn't get back over in time to make a play.

92
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by dmb :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:20pm

I'm not watching this game, but I can't believe that nobody has mentioned it: Matt Schaub has started his day by going 20/23 for 281 yards, 2 TDs, and no INTs. It looks like Andre Johnson has done most of the damage -- he already has 9 catches for 169 yards, and both of the touchdown catches.

I know it's against Seattle, but that sounds like a clinic.

103
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by dmb :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:30pm

At the half...

Schaub: 24/28, 336 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs

Johnson: 10 catches, 184 yards, 2 TDs

309
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by peterplaysbass (verified?) (not verified) :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 11:10am

I'd like to take this moment to brag that I have Schaub and Johnson on my fantasy team (which missed the playoffs, unfortunately). I'm having a monster day.

310
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by patriotsgirl :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 4:46pm

I had Brees and Marshall (in a PPR) - I made the playoffs, but this week was irrelevant for me. I hope they didn't peak too soon.

93
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:20pm

NO revert to their first quarter defense and let ATL methodically march down the field in their 2-minute drill. NO help the drive when Grant commits a stupid personal foul penalty. ATL end the half by kicking a FG to make the score NO 16, ATL 9.

96
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by DEW (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:22pm

I see the "Patriot Rules" are in effect for the refs on this drive, first the ghost PI call and then the defensive holding call to set up the touchdown. Can't have the Pats shut out at halftime, after all...

*end Dolphins fan grousing*

102
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by montanapanthersfan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:30pm

No comment.

104
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:30pm

A bit of a make-up call in reversing the Leigh Bodden interception---I have no idea what they saw on the replay.

113
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by patriotsgirl :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:41pm

The DPI was awful. The LB didn't even touch him, and Johnston didn't even notice. Oddly, the holding call wasn't nearly as bad, and that's the one the announcers noticed.

120
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:47pm

The announcers did make some noise about the DPI call. I have a bit of sympathy for the official, however, because the LB didn't look for the ball, did make a little contact, and the receiver fell down. Those are some hard circumstances if he's out of position.

97
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:23pm

Patriots reap the benefit of two ticky-tack PI/defensive holding calls with a Kevin Faulk TD.

98
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:26pm

Wow. DEN stuffed on 4th and inches. Great IND penetration to stop Moreno in the backfield.

100
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:30pm

I can second the notion that the Panthers are getting robbed... Broncos half a yard short, they go for it...... and get stuffed in the backfield again. Jerraud Powers in with the stop off the runblitz. Moreno had no chance, Gaffney fell asleep and let Powers make the play.

101
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:30pm

Manning has a pass batted into the air and Brian Dawkins lays out to make the interception. The DEN player who tipped the ball, Reid, takes off his helmet while still on the field and gets an unsportsman like penalty. As Bug Bunny would say, "What a maroon!"

105
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:31pm

[Vikings QB] throws one into Joseph's hands in the end zone. Rice is able to hit the ball just enough to make him drop it.

106
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:32pm

Intercepted by Dawkins on a tip drill. Broncos ball at the indy 48 29 seconds and too timeouts...

Untill Reid gets called for taking off his helmet, and loose 15 yards... F'ck..

107
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:32pm

The Vikings stall at the 6 and Longwell hits the field goal. 13-7 Vikings.

108
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:36pm

What a fitting end to the last two minutes of DEN-IND first half: Marshall catches a pass and instead of getting out of bounds since his team has no time outs, he gets tackled in bounds and the half expires. This came after a Colts punt, the Broncos failing to convert a 4th and inches, and a Manning interception. That was one of the ugliest two minutes of football I've seen in a long time.

110
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:37pm

The Bengals get the ball on the kickoff and come out in a hurry-up with 31 seconds to go in the first half and so they run . . . a draw and a very short pass to Leonard.

And Leonard appears to fumble. The Vikings recover and the Bengals call a timeout hoping to get a booth review, but there's no way this would get overturned.

Longwell good from 45 and the Vikings are up 16-7 at halftime.

111
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:38pm

Reason number 12.349 that DVOA rocks: Orton with an 8 yard completion to Marshall from the 48 yardline as time expires...

117
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:46pm

You want a statistical system that decides which plays are important?

112
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:39pm

This just in from Joe Buck: "The Saints are averaging 8 yards a play, which is terrific." Thanks for the brilliant insight, Joe.

114
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:42pm

Bengals@Vikings first half notes:

[Vikings QB] (hearts) Sidney Rice.
Leon Hall is seemingly always on the other side of the field from Rice, so it's possibly that [Vikings QB] is avoiding him or picking on Joseph or that Hall just always has his man covered (though we know this QB does not care if the player is covered).
The Bengals are getting a lot of pressure. Late in the half, the Vikings started countering with some rollouts but the Bengals' secondary has still had good coverage.
Palmer is constantly throwing into coverage and has been a bit off all day.

Halftime note:
Norman Esiason has gotten very old over the course of about the last 2 years.

115
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by patriotsgirl :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:44pm

Aikman's bugging me today for some reason. I'm a critic of long DPIs, but Grimes completely bodychecked and cut Meachem off. I think it was a good call.

121
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:47pm

I have no idea what Aikman is smoking. That was an obvious DPI.

116
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by patriotsgirl :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:46pm

Bush in for the TD on 3rd and 19. Not a good day to have Bush on my bench. Oh well, I'm in the playoffs as a 2 or 3 seed anyway...

118
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:46pm

Could Andre Johnson become the third-ever single-game 300-yard receiver?

128
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Raiderjoe :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:55pm

would be 5th one

others --

:

Jim benton, 1945 Ramms 303 yards vs loins on 11/22
Cloyce box, 50 loins 302 yds vs Volts on 12/3
Stephanie Paige, 85 chiefs 309 yds vs chargers on 12/22
Flipper Anderson, 11/26.89 rams vs Saints 336 ydrads

139
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:03pm

I cut it off at 1960 and forgot to say that, sorry.

I'm surprised there were 2 before then, though.

119
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:47pm

ATL brings a big blitz. Brees throws towards Meachem running down the left side line. The ATL DB, Grimes, makes contact with Meachem and seems to push him with his body towards the sideline. Grimes makes the apparent interception, but the zebra calls him for DPI. Even though the action by Grimes was subtle, I think it was the right call. The penalty goes for 28 yards and get NO into the red zone.

NO almost blow their opportunity as Bush fumbles on second down and barely recovers. On 3rd and 19, NO run a little screen to the right side to Bush. NO had incredible down field blocking on the play and Bush runs in untouched for the TD. NO 23 ATL 9.

123
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:51pm

And in the second half, the Bengals immediately kick off out of bounds.

124
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Big-Hairy-Andy :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:51pm

And Cincinatti start the second half continuing in the spirit of the first.

126
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by morganja :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:53pm

Zero penalties for the Patriots. Somehow they missed the automatic personal foul on a hit above the shoulders on a defenseless receiver. They missed the late hit on Moore. But they did manage to call two phantom critical calls against he Panthers. Seriously, how can Patriot fans take any pride in their team that gets such blatantly obvious favoritism from the refs? The NFL is really bending over backwards to give games to the Patriots. Maybe the Patriots aren't showing any effort because they know they don't have to. The refs will take care of it for them. No reason to exert themselves.

127
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:54pm

Why did they overturn the Leigh Bodden INT with no conclusive evidence on the TV replays? Some conspiracy that.

248
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by PatsFan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 9:04pm

Seriously, how can Patriot fans take any pride in their team that gets such blatantly obvious favoritism from the refs?

Easy -- because it's hilarious to watch mindless haters like you stroke out.

BTW, care to explain how the obvious-to-everyone touchback was called wrong and then upheld on replay, thus favoring the Panthers.

266
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by morganja :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 11:26pm

Was that suppose to be some kind of intelligent comment? Why are so many fair weather front running fans such jerks? Is it all part of the same bullying trait?

Tell me Patsfan, when the refs finally cease to give the Patriots special treatment, are you going to scream about the Patriots having to follow the same rules everyone else does, or will you just move quietly on to the next front-runner?

129
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:56pm

NO bring a double corner blitz. ATL pick it up and Redman hits Jenkins in stride for a 50-yard TD pass. NO 23 ATL 16.

130
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:57pm

There have been two penalties on the Vikings first drive of the second half now. And as I type that, [Vikings QB] completes a thrd-and-12 pass to Chester Taylor for the first down. The throw was low, but Taylor made the catch and took it for the first. Taylor is having a good day.

131
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by t.d. :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:59pm

this is how i expected favre to improve minnesota this year- as a limitted, run first guy who doesn't lose for them

132
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by morganja :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:59pm

Dude, if you weren't a Patriot fan you would realize that is called an incomplete pass every single time. It's not even close. Every other team in the league knows that's not a catch. The question is why Patriot fans assume that any call that could plausibly go their way automatically does.

134
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:01pm

I called out the "DPI" call upthread. Come off it.

142
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:05pm

Also, both of the "fouls" you mentioned would have been borderline calls themselves. Maybe if you weren't butthurt you'd realize that.

155
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by morganja :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:21pm

No. They aren't borderline calls. They are called every time against most of the teams in the league. Just not the Patriots.

133
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 3:59pm

Rookie Darcel McBath lays a HIT on Clarke to make him drop the ball - he would've had the first down.

135
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:01pm

Marshall for another first down. his 12th catch of the day - the NFL record is 20.

136
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:02pm

At 3:25 or the 3rd quarter, NO punt for the first time of the game.

137
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:02pm

Peterson TD.

Vikings up 23-7.

Childress has finally been reminded that his team is normally good at running the ball. This is not a good sign for the rest of the league.

138
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:03pm

Moreno stopped on 3rd and 1. Calling McDaniels: No more rushing today.

141
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:05pm

Bracket comes through untouched and sacks Orton. Which means that Indy blitzed... Shock... no wonder Moreno looked surprised...

143
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:08pm

Picked off!! Bailey tips it, and Dawkins pick it off... Manning simply overthrew it...

144
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:10pm

Benson fumbles, Benny Sapp picks it up and returns for a TD. Didn't look like a fumble to me in real time and now Cincy is challenging.

Dierdorf and Gumbel say it's not a fumble and on replay they appear to be right.

145
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:10pm

The Broncos are running well on early downs, but are getting whipped in short yardage situations...

Marshall for the first down. 13 catches...

146
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Raiderjoe :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:11pm

palmer with onluy 60 paass yardas vs crappy pass defense. maybe now down 16 will open up air attsck

146
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Raiderjoe :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:11pm

palmer with onluy 60 paass yardas vs crappy pass defense. maybe now down 16 will open up air attsck

148
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:11pm

14 catches

150
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:14pm

That puts him in the top 20 since 1960 but not even his career high. Sort of amazing.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/tiny/SfoPT

149
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:13pm

Well that had to happen. Ortons forces it to Marshall, and it's picked off deep in the redzone. The broncos left 3 on the field, there...

151
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:14pm

ATL drive 79 yards for the tying TD. Except for one series in the 2nd quarter, the Saints have not been able to stop the Falcons all day. 23-23.

152
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:18pm

Broncos suddenly getting pressure on Manning, forcing premature throws. The defense actually haven't been half bad, since getting smacked early on - pretty much shutting Indy down after the half.

DJ Williams just stayed with Collie +15 yards downfield, and his coverage forced an overthrow by Manning.

153
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by morganja :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:19pm

Moss blocking while pass is in the air. That's ok when you're a Patriot. Note the meaningless penalty called on the second half kick-off to try to cover up the fact that they aren't calling penalties on the Patiots.

159
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Big-Hairy-Andy :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:25pm

Not that you're bitter or anything...

166
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:32pm

Suggest you just stop watching that game.

197
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by morganja :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 5:12pm

As a rule I try not to watch Patriot games because of the dreadful one-sided officiating. But it's a Panther game so I have to suffer through it. And suffer throught it is exactly right.

247
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by PatsFan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 9:02pm

You must not watch Colts games, either, then.

154
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:21pm

15

156
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:23pm

And that makes Marshall the first player since 1960 to have 2 games catching 15 or more passes in his career.

157
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:25pm

Matt Prater misses a field goal. The Broncos have left a lot of points and yards on the field. This game has been very close since the Colts went up 21-0.

158
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:25pm

Cedric Benson just ran for 42 yards through a hole the size of a small country. The Bengals aren't dead yet.

160
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:26pm

McBath with the pick now! Manning never saw him playing the zone... pass complete to gaffney down on the indy 15...

163
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:30pm

Ochocinco loses the ball when he gets hit by Cedric Griffin (in the process of making a very nice catch) and gets up very angry. Griffin gets called for a personal foul, correctly, for going after Ochocinco's head. Griffin and Ochocinco shake hands.

164
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:31pm

Prater makes a 28 yarder to make it 21-10. This game isn't over, the way the Denver defense has been playing.

165
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by patriotsgirl :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:31pm

Aikman's not having a good game. DPI by NO, it might have been ticky-tack, but he kind of forgot there was an offside on the same play.

Brees gets intentional grounding for throwing it out of the end zone...I can't remember the last time I saw that called.

They kick a FG anyway, and Atlanta's not out of it.

167
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:32pm

The Vikings defense was able to stonewall the Bengals so Graham has to kick a 23-yard field goal. It's now 23-10 Minnesota.

168
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:35pm

Goodman has been outstanding today. Has punched the ball away from garcon three times on deep would be completions. Indy three and out again(!).

169
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by patriotsgirl :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:37pm

Whoops. Atlanta starts out with decent field position, loses 12 on a Wildcat formation (snuffed out by Gay), then Redman throws a pick. NO ball inside the 30.

Given that Atlanta has been moving the ball down the field, I'm a bit surprised by the play call...

170
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:38pm

16

171
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by justme_cd :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:40pm

I've been impressed with the cincy corners today. I wish they could have found a way to keep Mike Zimmer in Dallas.

172
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:40pm

17

173
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:42pm

18... this is wild..

174
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:43pm

19... bonkers...

175
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by TimK :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:44pm

And number 20 is for a touchdown... game still very much on.

176
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:45pm

Goodness, those Kay commercials are corny...

177
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:46pm

20! And it's a touchdown!

Ties T.O. record. Indy had Jennings one on one - easy jumpball for Marshall!

180
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:51pm

I hereby take back all the stuff I said before the season (and before and during last season) about not wanting Marshall on the team.

178
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:47pm

Vikings get a running into the kicker call and Dierdorf says it's a bad call because the punter fell over on the Vikings player who was on the ground but it's still called.

Then they punt it again and the Vikings get called for a block in the back on the return. Wow.

179
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:48pm

The broncos, down 5, goes for two, and runs it for 1 yard. This must be the worst short yardage performance against the colts in the decade.

181
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:51pm

Manning is 16 for 38 - extreme. Especially when you think about how he started the match!

182
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:53pm

morganja is going to love that roughing the kicker call (legit IMHO; taking out the plant foot is always 15 yards).

186
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:56pm

Pats go up 20-10 on the ensuing Gostkowski FG.

189
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:58pm

(I wonder why the competition committee didn't do away with the 5-yard call along with the 5-yard facemask call.)

200
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by morganja :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 5:20pm

I agree that is should be. But it wasn't called earlier this year when the exact same thing happened to the Panthers. I don't disagree with this call, but I'm flabbergasted by it not being called earlier this year. That is what I'm talking about. A little bit of consistency. Why does the NFL have one standard for 4 or 5 teams, and a totally different standard for the other 27?

226
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Mervin (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 6:59pm

Yep, congratulations, you've figured it all out. The NFL is as fixed as pro wrestling on a bad day. And they'd have gotten away with it too, if not for the eagle eye and razor-sharp impartiality (tolerance tested to the width of half an electron) of Sgt. Morganja, American hero. Whew! So do be a dear and let us know what the script is for the rest of the season, since you're so obviously privy to it and can make yourself and all of us rich.

Or in other words: Bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit
bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit
bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit
bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit bullshit.

And I don't even *like* the Patriots.

250
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by steveo_in_sd (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 9:16pm

Dude - chill out. This isn't the ESPN or FOXSports comments area.

184
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:54pm

Me hailing the Bronco second half defense has jinxed it - Colts on the 33...

185
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:56pm

Interesting end to the NO-ATL game. NO get down into the red zone. On 4th and 7 instead of kicking the FG to go up by 6, they go for it. Brunnell could have thrown to two different receivers, but hesitates, so the pass goes incomplete.

ATL start to drive down the field. They get a nice gain to Snelling when he sneaks out of the backfield and catches a little pass over the middle for about 12 yards. Ultimately, the drive bogs down and on 4th and 2, ATL try the little pass to Snelling again. This time, Vilma is waiting for the play and stuffs Snelling a yard short of the line of gain. NO then runs out the clock to win 26-23 and go 13-0.

190
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jayinalaska :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:58pm

I should have mentioned that NO lined up in FG formation with Brunnell as the holder.

199
Fake FG
by Joseph :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 5:17pm

All I can say is that Coach Payton deserves to get criticized BIG-TIME for that call. You HAVE TO kick the FG to go up by 6, and make the Falcons make the TD with approx. 1:30 to go. Thankfully, the D stops them to let him avoid a little bit of the criticism. Payton has obviously BIG BRASS ones, but sometimes the obvious call is the right one.

187
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:57pm

A false start called on Manning. hmm

188
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 4:57pm

Peterson TD with 3:24 to go makes it 30-10 Vikings. Peterson sets the team record with 14 rushing TDs on the year. And I know tonight when I'm surrounded by local fans they're going to say, as they always do, that he doesn't matter. Only one person matters . . .

196
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 5:10pm

So glad to see him show up the week after my fantasy team was kept out of the players thanks in no small part to his no-shows the past two weeks.

203
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Still Alive (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 5:24pm

You think that is bad...

My team is the second highest scoring in my league, and finished 7-6. For round 1 of the playoffs I am playing the highest scoring team (which also finished 7-6). Stupid people who like head to head scoring (One of the lowest scoring teams has a bye in the playoffs and finished 10-3)...

So week 1 of the playoffs and half our guys have played and the score looks to end up around 135-135.

This is in a league where 70pts a game will typically get you a win because touchdowns are worth very little. The projected final scores are 135-135, 100-65, 70-65, and 65-45...

205
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Still Alive (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 5:26pm

And the two people with byes are looking to put up up 80 and 45 pts respectively...

192
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 5:03pm

TD clark - his 3rd. That ices it: Indy up 12 points with 2:25 to go, no timeouts for broncos.

This last drive took 12 plays and 10 minutes and 3 timeouts. Incredible.

193
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 5:04pm

T-JACK IS BACK!

Unfortunately, [Vikings QB] seems to get increased screen time (believe it or not) when he's on the sideline.

195
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Danish Denver-Fan :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 5:10pm

At the two minute warning, here's some totals from the game:
Manning: 20/42 200 4/3
Orton: 29/41 277 2/1
Marshall: 22 210 2 lg: 23 (New record for catches in a game)
Moreno: 23 for 63 = rediculos number of carries considering the succes of the passing game..

201
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 5:22pm

Woohoo! Wade goes for it on 4th and four on the SD 35 less than 5 minutes in. And it works!

202
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 5:23pm

Is it just me, or is the sound mixing on CBS just awful? I'm having a lot of trouble hearing the announcers over the crowd noise.

204
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 5:25pm

I think they seem rather quiet too but I'm quite happy about it.

207
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 6:17pm

God I hope Wade's decision to go on 4th and goal (~ 1ft) doesn't get picked to death.

209
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 6:21pm

Rivers throws an awful interception from his own end zone, so with any luck we'll be spared.

208
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by jedmarshall :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 6:21pm

I give up on trying to understand pass interference. Jackson gets absolutely run over with no call then Rivers throws up a duck INT on the next play. Cowboys back in business.

210
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 6:24pm

The official didn't appear to have a great view as the WR changed direction suddenly, and he probably assumed incidental feet-tangling. I'm starting to think that the PI rule as written just can't be properly judged with any kind of reliability.

211
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by John (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 6:26pm

Apropos of nothing: I went perusing the Jags' blogs to see what they were saying about the loss, and about the upcoming Thursday night Colts game.

Top 6 blogs per Google show a whopping 2 posts today, with the most recent posts on the other 4 blogs:
* Yesterday
* Friday
* December 3rd(!)
* October 12th(!!)

You'd think a team in the driver's seat for a wild card slot would get a little attention from the local fans. Does anyone really not think the team will move at this point?

216
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 6:40pm

Driver's seat? They're not in control of their own destiny at the moment; in the (admittedly unlikely) scenario that all of the Broncos, the Dolphins, and the Jaguars win out, and no other teams are level with the 'phins and the Jags, then the Jags would go home on the head-to-head tiebreaker. I see your point about fan interest though.

218
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Big-Hairy-Andy :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 6:43pm

They were before they lost to Miami.

219
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 6:44pm

This is true.

220
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 6:46pm

Actually, did they have fewer conference /losses/ than the other teams?

224
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by John (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 6:55pm

Does it matter? Before today, there were two 7-5 teams in the AFC: Patriots and Jags. If the Jags won out, they would have been in the playoffs.

221
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 6:48pm

The whole "driver's seat" doesn't make much sense at this point. If the Jaguars win out and the Dolphins win out, well, the Dolphins win the AFC East because the Jaguars have a game left against New England, and the Dolphins would win the tiebreaker (conference record) if the Patriots lost that game.

227
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 7:06pm

You're both right.

212
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Yaguar :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 6:28pm

I'm going to go ahead and posit that Keith Null is not an NFL-ready QB.

213
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by John (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 6:30pm

Have the /dev/null jokes started yet?

215
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Big-Hairy-Andy :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 6:39pm

There's geekery, then there's linux geekery.

More importantly, who exactly IS Keith Null?

222
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by John (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 6:50pm

Worse, it's UNIX geekery. /dev/null was (probably) around before Linus was in grade school.

I'm not certain when it was created, but it's been around since at least 1976.

/dev/null for the uninitiated, courtesy Wikipedia.

217
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 6:42pm

Look out dude, you'll turn this into an irrational thread ;)

223
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 6:53pm

Null is decidedly not irrational!

225
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by John (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 6:57pm

From Wikipedia:
...in a seminormed vector space such as Minkowski space, null vectors are, in general, non-zero

If they're non-zero, there's a chance they're irrational. Right?

(Don't ask me what a seminormed vector space is, though.)

228
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 7:16pm

I could explain seminormed vector spaces, but then the guild of mathematicians would slash my tires. I don't want to mess with those guys.

229
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by John (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 7:20pm

These are people who would describe a knife in terms of its curvature. I'll take my chances with their ability to handle one in a tense situation.

Now a physicist might actually talk about tensile strength, and now we're talking about someone of whom I might be wary.

230
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 7:20pm

Mathematician roomie sez: "A 'Minkowski space' is typically a real vector space, and an 'irrational number' is typically a real number. Although the real numbers can be interpreted as a one-dimensional vector space over themselves, there's only one 'reasonable' way to do so, and in that case, there's no nondegenerate seminorm that has a nonzero null vector."

239
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Big-Hairy-Andy :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 7:36pm

Vector = geometric object with length + direction
Vector space = collection of vectors
Seminormed vector space = collection of vectors capable of zero length

Therefore:

Seminormed vector space = Bills offensive playbook?

214
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by patriotsgirl :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 6:36pm

Raiders get nailed for interfering with the ability to field a punt because the coverage was so good that the officials thought that he'd gotten there early, then get nailed for unsportsmanlike conduct because their bench freaked out.

Redskins start on the 40, run a couple of big plays, and are now in the red zone. Oh, Raiders.

231
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Karl Cuba :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 7:22pm

On UK's NFL coverage they just announced that there will be two games in the UK next season. One of the home teams is the 49ers, does anyone know who the other team is?

234
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 7:26pm

Just found a rumor that it'd be the Ravens who had the other "home game" at Wembley.

232
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 7:23pm

Sweet fake punt by the Rams. Down by 33 at the end of the 3rd quarter, why not?

233
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 7:25pm

Because if it doesn't work, it'll be cited as more evidence as coaching incompetence?

235
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by RickD :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 7:28pm

Spagnuolo is a first-year coach. I thought the big problem in St. Louis was a lack of players.

236
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by just another dumb homer (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 7:30pm

I personally wouldn't make that argument, but there are some who would. I'd really love it if teams out of playoff contention ran a lot of junk.

237
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by patriotsgirl :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 7:31pm

Eh, I think down 33, it would get buried within a lot of other criticisms.

And Touchdown, Rams!

DeMarcus Ware is down, and it doesn't look good. It looks like a head injury.

238
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by patriotsgirl :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 7:33pm

Ware is conscious and can move his hands, so that's a positive sign.

240
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by DEW (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 7:37pm

So what happened to Gradkowski? Did he get hurt, or has Al Davis stormed down to the bench and demanded that this burst of vaguely competent quarterbacking be stopped immediately?

241
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Big-Hairy-Andy :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 7:40pm

Injured, as is Vince Young. Collins is in for the Titans too.

242
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by DEW (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 7:43pm

Too bad; awful break for the Raiders if it's serious. Lousy for Young and the Titans, although at least this game's not on the line for them, so they can shut down Young with the hamstring and not take any chances.

243
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous33 (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 7:48pm

Is it just me, or is the HD broadcast of Chargers/Cowboys like 10 minutes behind the actual game? Yahoo and NFL.com have both had the score at 17-10 for a while and say there's 9:13 left in the fourth. Meanwhile, on my TV it's still 10-10 with 11:28 left.

249
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by dk240t :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 9:10pm

Seems like Houston is continuing on its course of being one of the teams that DVOA/Pythagoras identifies as good, despite a bad record. Another blowout of a weak team (Seattle) to go with the blowout over Oakland and a bunch of close losses. I don't see how they don't increase their DVOA this week.

251
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by CathyW :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 9:38pm

First drive by the Eagles - very impressive. Too bad the game can't end right now; I have a feeling this is going to be a typical Eagles-Giants knock-down drag-out.

252
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Spoilt Victoria... :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 9:46pm

Okay, now the game can end.

253
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by patriotsgirl :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 10:16pm

That drive was...strange. 2 drops, 2 illegal contacts, then a catch and some terrible tackling.

Quintin Mikell did not have a good drive.

254
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous234 (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 10:27pm

How was that not DPI in the end zone on the Giants there?

255
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Spoilt Victoria... :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 10:35pm

Hey it's Eagles-Giants, you don't make that call!

Oh, the Giants got five extra plays from two illegal contacts on the previous drive?

256
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous234 (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 10:41pm

I'd pay good money to see The Daily Show destroy some of these announcers.

257
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by patriotsgirl :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 10:56pm

Yes! I've thought the same. The blatant contradictions/backtracking alone would fill up a full show.

And I hate many DPI calls, but think that Celek was mauled.

258
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous234 (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 10:58pm

Officials reviewing an obvious catch by DeSean Jackson. WTF?

259
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous234 (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 10:59pm

I mean, after all the crap they /didn't/ review...

260
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous234 (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 11:05pm

Clock expiring isn't reviewable in the NFL? You're kidding, right?

263
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by The Guy You Don't Want to Hear (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 11:09pm

How could they review that? I mean, we don't want to review judgment calls like clocks ticking down.

264
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous234 (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 11:13pm

The x million dollar question, which I haven't seen answered conclusively, is whether it is a reviewable call in college football.

265
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous234 (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 11:20pm

Well after researching this a bit, it appears Big 12 officials used the justification that the review officials may correct "egregious" errors not specifically enumerated. Pay no attention to the bowl purses...

261
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Spoilt Victoria... :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 11:06pm

At this point you just have to laugh.

262
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous234 (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 11:08pm

a. The official time should be kept on the field, soccer-style.

b. This officiating crew is not having a good night.

267
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous234 (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 11:29pm

Eli misses Kevin Boothe, an offensive lineman who lined up at the tight end position. When did they stop cutting to the official announcing eligibility changes?

268
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Paul R :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 11:33pm

The commercial for the Oral-B electric toothbrush claims that the toothbrush design is "dentist-inspired."

269
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous234 (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 11:36pm

The Eagles finally get a call (at least for now) with Eli fumbling on the slide. Captcha: lunacy

270
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by NickL (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 11:43pm

OK, I'm confused--clearly both knees hit ground before Eli began to lose control of the ball--why does anybody even care if he was touched or not?

271
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Salvi's Headband (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 11:45pm

Because in the NFL you're only down if you're put down by contact. Clearly Eli dove of his own volition and therefore would not have been down until he was touched.

bleh..

272
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by patriotsgirl :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 11:48pm

And he dove headfirst. If he'd slid feet first, he'd have been down when he hit the ground.

273
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous234 (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 11:49pm

NFL players aren't down if they aren't touched. If the QB takes a knee or slides on purpose, the officials will kill the play to reduce the incidence player injury, but the play isn't over until the whistle.

274
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous234 (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 11:52pm

My bad. Like most simple explanations of NFL rules, this one is wrong.

277
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Spoilt Victoria... :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 11:59pm

I believe the explanation is just that a head-first slide (or "dive" or whatever) doesn't count as a play-terminating slide.

275
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous234 (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 11:53pm

The first play after the Giants take the lead, McNabb hits Jackson on a long TD pass. What happened to the Giants' famed pass rush?

276
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Salvi's Headband (not verified) :: Sun, 12/13/2009 - 11:58pm

Strahan retired, and Osi, Tuck, and Kiwanuka turned out to be overrated pretenders. And I say this as a Giant's fan.

278
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous234 (not verified) :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 12:00am

Officials miss a Giant headbutt after the play.

279
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous234 (not verified) :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 12:06am

No one's going to believe me at this point when I say that I root for a team in the AFC, but this is starting to remind me of an NBA game.

281
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Spoilt Victoria... :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 12:11am

Well that could just be the score.

289
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by DM (not verified) :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 12:25am

I agree the officiating is lousy, but let's not go that far...

280
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Lvess :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 12:07am

Since when is missing a tackle and slamming into your own teammate worth a 15 yard late hit flag? High commedy to watch two Eagles DB's do just that? Yes. A flag? No.

282
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by batbatt :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 12:15am

an actual reverse?

287
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous234 (not verified) :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 12:21am

As opposed to a mere end-around off of a QB bootleg?

306
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Jay Gloab :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 9:26am

Isn't that a reverse?

283
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Alexander :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 12:15am

AN excellent Vick use there, in spite of it not working that well.

284
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous234 (not verified) :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 12:17am

Man, neither team can tackle tonight.

285
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Salvi's Headband (not verified) :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 12:20am

The Giants defense is a huge pile of garbage.

286
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Salvi's Headband (not verified) :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 12:21am

Why won't someone break the legs of that dog killing piece of garbage. Seeing him out there makes my blood boil.

288
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by DM (not verified) :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 12:24am

I can't stand Vick but I'm guessing you couldn't care less about Leonard Little.

292
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Salvi's Headband (not verified) :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 12:38am

There's a big difference between an accident, even one caused by gross negligence, and deliberated, premeditated, sociopathic cruelty. Vick is pond scum.

295
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by DM (not verified) :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 12:45am

Absolutely. What Vick did makes me sick, but I'm tired of people immediately reacting to anything having to do with Vick with hyperbolic outrage. Realize that most people hate him too.

290
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous234 (not verified) :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 12:33am

TD Giants, challenge Eagles. Receiver's toe may have been on the white...

291
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous234 (not verified) :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 12:36am

Play overturned. Collinsworth with some pointed comments about Manningham's route running.

And now a Giants receiver seemingly goes out of bounds but the officials declare forward progress and keep the clock rolling?

293
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Salvi's Headband (not verified) :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 12:44am

Giants should have kicked it deep. When you have timeouts and that much time, the three and out is a much better bet than the OSK.

296
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous234 (not verified) :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 12:47am

Hm. If I were playing Madden I'd definitely kick it deep, but I'm terrible at recovering onside kicks in that game. Maybe the stats wizards have something to say. I liked Collinsworth's idea of trying to pooch it over the hands team though.

297
Re: Week 14 Open Discussion Thread
by Anonymous234 (not verified) :: Mon, 12/14/2009 - 12:48am

You also have to take a DeSean Jackson return into account.

Topic Locked